- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Editorial Team / Rédaction
- Editorial Advisory Board / Comité scientifique
- Reviewers / Evaluateurs
- Ethics and malpractice statement / Déclaration d'éthique
- Allegations of misconduct
- Complaints process
- Conflicts of interest
- Authorship criteria
- Copyright/Droits d'auteur
- Contact
Focus and Scope
DOI: 10.21409/essachess.1775-352x
ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies is the only French journal in communication sciences to promote in French and English language original contributions in the field of social, cultural, symbolic or economic communication. All contributions in the humanities and social sciences fields related to communication inquiries are welcomed. The journal publishes original articles whose diversity of reading levels and disciplinary boundaries, help through international innovative contributions to a better understanding of a regional issues.
ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies stands out by five essential features that together confer its uniqueness:
1. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies is the only French journal that meets the need to promote and make available the results of international research in the areas of the communication sciences to French researchers and among themselves, taking into account that the results of the international research in the area of the communication sciences are virtually absent in the French academic journals on communication.
2. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies is the only French journal that publishes the best research interdisciplinary papers on social, cultural, symbolic, and economic communication.
3. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies is the only French journal that integrates and covers all the subfields on the communication sciences.
4. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies is the only French journal that builds bridges through the thematic fields covered between the French network of research in the communication sciences, and the networks of international research both disciplinary and interdisciplinary in the Americas, Canada, Asia, Africa, as well as Eastern, Central, and Western Europe.
5. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies achieves an exceptional quality for the published articles through a double-blind peer review process of evaluation involving systematically for each article French and foreign experts at the same time.
Essachess Academic Association is the journal's owner.
Organizations publishing the journal: University Paul Valéry of Montpellier 3, ESSACHESS and IARSIC for the electronic version.
European Institute for the printed version.
The articles peer reviewed and published in Essachess are not previously subjected to any fee.
This journal benefits from the patronage of the Agence universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF).
***
ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies est la seule revue française dans le domaine des Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication à promouvoir en français et en anglais des Etudes Scientifiques Spécialisées Appliquées aux Communications Humaines, Economiques, Sociales et Symboliques. La revue publie des articles scientifiques originaux dont la diversité des niveaux de lecture et des découpages disciplinaires, contribuent par des apports internationaux innovants à une meilleure compréhension des problématiques régionales.
Les articles évalués et publiés dans Essachess ne sont préalablement soumis à aucun frais.
Essachess bénéficie du parrainage de l'Agence universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF).
Section Policies
Introduction
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Dossier
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Varia
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Research notes/Book reviews
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Papers are selected by a committee of national and international researchers (from the referees committee or another international experts, both external to the editorial team members) with reputation in their research domains. In the peer-review process, two referees independently evaluate the scientific quality of the submitted manuscripts. ESSACHESS uses a blind peer-review system. When the reviewers have completed their work, the editors examine their comments and decide whether the paper is ready to be published, needs another round of revisions, or should be rejected. Where contributions are judged as acceptable for publication on the basis of content, the Editorial Board reserves the right to modify the typescripts to eliminate ambiguity and repetition and improve communication between author and reader.
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 3-8 months. After acceptance, it currently takes 3-6 months to compile the article into an online volume and issue. The print copy follows 5-8 weeks later.
Reviewer reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate a manuscript for:
- originality and significance of contribution
- international relevance
- coverage of appropriate existing literature
- adequacy of methodology, analysis and interpretation
- clear, concise and jargon-free writing style
- organisation
Due to the high volume of manuscripts being submitted we do not send editorial comments for unpublished texts.
Prospective authors should be aware that ESSACHESS normally publishes only around 15% of the texts received.
***
Les articles en français ou en anglais soumis à la revue ESSACHESS pour publication seront examinés par le comité de rédaction afin d'évaluer s’ils correspondent au projet éditorial de la revue (prescreening). Dans l'affirmative, ils seront expertisés sous anonymat par au moins deux experts, chercheurs/enseignants-chercheurs nationaux et internationaux, extérieurs au comité de rédaction. Dans le processus d'examen par les pairs, au moins deux experts évaluent indépendamment la qualité scientifique des manuscrits soumis. ESSACHESS utilise un système d'évaluation en double aveugle par les pairs. Lorsque les experts-évaluateurs ont terminé leur travail, les rédacteurs examinent leurs avis et commentaires et décident si l'article est prêt à être publié, nécessite une nouvelle série de révisions ou s'il doit être rejeté. Lorsque les contributions sont jugées acceptables pour publication sur la base du contenu, le comité de rédaction demande à l’auteur/aux auteurs de mettre son/leur texte en conformité avec la charte éditoriale de la revue ESSACHESS. Le comité de rédaction se réserve le droit de modifier les textes dactylographiés pour éliminer l'ambiguïté et la répétition et améliorer la communication entre l'auteur et le lecteur.
Un manuscrit est évalué dans 3-8 mois. Après l'acceptation, la publication suivra normalement dans les 3-5 mois à venir.
Critères d'évaluation: originalité, formulation du problème, maîtrise des concepts, connaissance de la littérature et bibliographie, logique et cohérence globale, style et lisibilité.
Les numéros thématiques de la revue Essachess suivent exactement la même procédure d'expertise des articles que celle dédiée aux numéros ordinaires. Dans l'appel à communications sont mentionnés le calendrier de soumission pour les résumés, les délais d'évaluation des résumés, la date de soumission de l'article complet une fois le résumé accepté, la deadline concernant la communication des résultats des expertises des articles complets ainsi que celle concernant l'acceptation de l'article révisé (le cas échéant).
Lorsqu'un projet de numéro thématique est soumis à la revue, la rédaction, de concert avec des membres du comité éditoriale étendu, spécialistes de la question étudient la proposition. Si elle est en adéquation avec la charte de la revue, sa portée et ses objectifs et répondent aux critères scientifiques d'originalité, d'innovation, de portée internationale, de pertinence, de maîtrise et de connaissance de l'actualité scientifique, de logique et cohérence globale, de style et lisibilité, elle est sélectionnée. Les articles soumis pour les numéros thématiques de la revue Essachess suivent exactement la même procédure d'expertise que les articles soumis hors numéros thématiques.
En raison du nombre élevé de manuscrits soumis, ESSACHESS ne transmet pas les commentaires pour les textes qui ne sont pas retenus en vue de publication.
La revue ESSACHESS publie seulement environ 15% des textes reçus.
Publication Frequency
Beginning in 2010, the journal appears on the following dates:
(January-July) July 23th
(July-December) December 23th
***
A partir de 2010, la revue est publiée aux mois de juillet (le 23 juillet: Janvier-Juillet-) et de décembre (le 23 décembre:Juillet-Décembre).
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Editorial Team / Rédaction
Fondateur et directeur de la publication / Founder and editor
Stefan BRATOSIN
Université Paul Valéry de Montpellier, France
Directrice de la rédaction et rédactrice en chef / Executive-editor in chief
Mihaela-Alexandra TUDOR
Université Paul Valéry Montpellier, France
Secrétaire de la rédaction / Assistant
Marie JAUFFRET
CTS-IARSIC/CORHIS EA 7400, Université Paul Valéry de Montpellier, France/contact@essachess.com, essachess@gmail.com
Comité de rédaction / Members of editorial team
Stefan BRATOSIN (CTS-IARSIC/CORHIS EA 7400, Université Paul Valéry de Montpellier, France/contact@essachess.com), Denise Elaine BURRILL (Fitchburg State University, USA/denise_simion@post.harvard.edu), Catherine GHOSN (CTS-IARSIC/CORHIS EA 7400, Université de Toulouse, France/catherine.ghosn@gmail.com), Mihaela-Alexandra TUDOR (CTS-IARSIC/CORHIS EA 7400, Université Paul Valéry de Montpellier, France/essachess@gmail.com)
Editorial Advisory Board / Comité scientifique
Ana ADI, Quadriga University of Applied Sciences, GERMANY
ana.adi@quadriga.eu
Delia BALABAN, Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie
delia.balaban@ubbcluj.ro
Lee BECKER, James M. Cox Jr. Center for International Mass Communication Training and Research, University of Georgia, USA
lee.becker@uga.edu
Adrian BEJAN, Duke University, USA
abejan@duke.edu
Françoise BERNARD, Université Aix-Marseille, France
francoise.bernard@univ-amu.fr
Robert BOURE, Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse, France
robert.boure@iut-tlse3.fr
Constantin BRATIANU, Académie d’Etudes Economiques de Bucarest, Roumanie
constantin.bratianu@gmail.com
Olivier CHANTRAINE, Université Charles de Gaulle Lille 3, France
olivier.chantraine@univ-lille3.fr
Mihai COMAN, Université de Bucarest, Roumanie
mcoman@fjsc.ro
Gheorghe CLITAN, Université de l'Ouest de Timisoara, Roumanie
gheorghe.clitan@e-uvt.ro
Eric DACHEUX, Université Clermont Auvergne, France
dacheux.perso@orange.fr
Lise DEMAILLY, CLERSE UMR 8019, Université Lille 1, France
lise.demailly@univ-lille1.fr
Ion DUR, Ecole doctorale en Philosophie, Université technique de Cluj Napoca-Centre Baia Mare, Roumanie
iondur@yahoo.com
Jairo FERREIRA, Escola da Industria Criativa, PPGCC -Unisinos, Sao Leopoldo, BRESIL
JFERREIRA@unisinos.br
Gustavo Daudt FISCHER, Escola da Industria Criativa, PPGCC -Unisinos, Sao Leopoldo, BRESIL
GFISCHER@unisinos.br
Elena FELL, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Russia
elena.fell@ntlworld.com
Pierre-Henri FRANCOIS, Université de Poitiers, France
pierre-henri.francois@univ-poitier.fr
Sandu FRUNZA, Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie
sfrunza@yahoo.com
Magda FUSARO, Homoludens - Groupe de recherche sur la communication et la socialisation dans les jeux vidéo, Université du Montréal à Québec, Canada
fusaro.magda@uqam.ca
Amiso M. GEORGE (TC University, Fort Worth, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
a.george2@tcu.edu
Pedro Gilberto GOMES, Escola da Industria Criativa, PPGCC -Unisinos, Sao Leopoldo, BRESIL
PGOMES@unisinos.br
Gino GRAMACCIA, Université de Bordeaux 1, France
gino.gramaccia@u-bordeaux.fr
Régis GUILLAUME, Université du Mirail Toulouse, France
regis.guillaume@univ-tlse2.fr
Najwa HAMAOUI, UMONS, Belgique
najwa.hamaoui@gmail.com
Lama HAMANDI, American University of Beyrouth, Liban
lh13@aub.edu.lb
Claudiu HERTELIU, Académie d'Etudes Economique, Bucarest, Roumanie
claudiu.herteliu@gmail.com
Tamar KATRIEL, Université de Haifa, Israel
tamark@edu.haifa.ac.il
Roula KHOURY, Université St Joseph de Beyrouth, Liban
Sylvie LELEU-MERVIEL, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis, France
sylvie.merviel@univ-valenciennes.fr
Joëlle LE MAREC, Celsa Paris Sorbonne, France
joelle.le_marec@celsa.paris-sorbonne.fr
Christian LE MOËNNE, Université de Rennes 2, France
christian.lemoenne@wanadoo.fr
Guy LOCHARD, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3, France
guy.lochard@sorbonne-nouvelle.fr
Margreth LŰNENBORG, Free University of Berlin, Germany
margreth.luenenborg@fu-berlin.de
Natalia LUKIANOVA, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk State University, Russia
lukianova@tpu.ru
Noemi MARIN, Florida Atlantic University, USA.
nmarin@fau.edu
Regina Maria MARTELETO, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde, Université de Brésil, Brésil
regina.mar2@gmail.com
Sorin NASTASIA, Southern Illinois University, USA
snastas@siue.edu
Antonio Fausto NETO, Escola da Industria Criativa, PPGCC -Unisinos, Sao Leopoldo, BRESIL
afaustoneto@gmail.com
Robert NOUMEN, Université d’Orléans, France
noumen@univ-paris13.fr
Paul RASSE, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, France
rasse@unice.fr
Daniela ROVENTA-FRUMUSANI, Université de Bucarest, Roumanie
danifrumusani@yahoo.com
Constantin SALAVASTRU, Université « Al. I. Cuza » Iasi, Roumanie
csalav2006@yahoo.com
Ilie RAD, Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie
ilierad@yahoo.com
Martine ROQUES, Université de Poitiers, France
martine.roques@univ-poitiers.fr
Haytham SAFAR, UMONS, Belgique
safar@umons.ac.be
Constantin SCHIFIRNET, Ecole Nationale d’Etudes Politiques et Administratives Bucarest, Roumanie
constantin.schifirnet@yahoo.com
Michel SENECAL, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada
Panayiota TSATSOU, University of Leicester, Great Britain
pt133@le.ac.uk
Phillippe VIALLON (EA 2310 LISEC, UNISTRA, France)
viallon@unistra.fr
Tudor VLAD, James M. Cox Jr. Center for International Mass Communication Training and Research, University of Georgia, USA
tvlad@uga.edu
Jean-Marc ZULIANI, Université du Mirail Toulouse, France
jean-marc.zuliani@univ-tlse2.fr
Reviewers / Evaluateurs
Ana ADI, Quadriga University of Applied Sciences, GERMANY, Serge AGOSTINELLI (Université des Antilles, France), Hasan ARSLAN, Canakkale University (Turkey), Françoise ALBERTINI (Université de Corse Pasquale Paoli, France), Enka Blanchard (CNRS, France; Hélène BREDA (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, FRance); George BONDOR (Université AL. I. Cuza, Roumanie), Anne BEYAERT-GESLIN (Université Bordeaux Montaigne, France), Michel BOURSE (Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey), Cécilia BRASSIER-RODRIGUES (Université Clermont Auvergne, France), Ioana CIRSTOCEA (CNRS, CESSP Paris, France & CEFRES Prague), Aurélie OLIVESI ( Université Lyon 1, FRANCE), Wole ADAMOLEKUN (Department of Mass Communication, Elizade University, Nigeria), Elena FELL (Middlesex University London, UK); Bertrand FAURE (Paul Sabatier University, FRANCE); Lena Hübner (University of Ottawa, Canada); Daniel-Rareș OBADĂ (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania); Thomas STOECKLE (Bournemouth University, UK); Camila Pérez Lagos (ISTC, ETHICS, Université de Lille, France); Patrick PLANTE (Université TÉLUQ, CANADA), Elina ERZIKOVA (Central Michigan University, USA), Aissa MERAH (Université Bejaia, Algérie), Corina BUZOIANU, Communication Department, SNSPA (Romania), Theresa CARILLI, (Professor, Department of Communication and Creative Arts, Purdue University Norhtwest, USA), Viorel CERNICA (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), Sophie COLAS (CeRIES, University of Lille, France), Audra Diers-Lawson (Institute for Communication, Høyskolen Kristiania, Norway), Paul F. Diehl (University of Illinois, USA), Daniela Elena DUMITRU (Académie d'Etudes Economiques de Bucarest, Roumanie), Hamida EL BOUR (Institut de Presse et des Sciences de l'nformation, Tunisie) Laurence LAROCHELLE (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, FRANCE & Université du Québec à Montréal, CANADA), Patrizia LAUDATI (Université Valencienne, France), Eugene LOOS, Utrecht School of Governance, Utrecht (The Netherlands), Krisztina Frauhammer (University of Szeged, Hungary), Pei-Chun KO, Singapore University of Social Sciences (Singapore), Natalia Raimondo Anselmino (CONICET, Centro de Investigaciones en Mediatizaciones, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina), Tereza Roncakova (Department of Journalism, Faculty of Arts and Letters of the Catholic University in Ruzomberok, Slovaquie),Lucrecia D Alessio Ferrara (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil), Márcia Marat Grilo (Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Portugal), Marielle METGE-AGOSTINELLI (Université des Antilles, France), Pierluigi BASSO (Université Lyon 2, France), Camil GOLUB (Rutgers University - Newark, USA), Etienne CANDEL (Université Paris-Sorbonne, France), Jean-Jacques BOUTAUD (Université de Bourgogne, France), Oana BALUTA (Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies, University of Bucharest, Romania), Romulus BRINCOVEANU (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie),Stéphane DUFOUR (Université de Bourgogne, France), Hannah MARSTON,School of Health, Wellbeing & Social Care, The Open University (UK), Valentina MARINESCU, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social (Romania), Isabelle RIEUSSET LEMARIE (Université Paris 1, France), Axel GRYSPEERDT (Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgique), Anda BECUT (National Institute for Research and Cultural Training, Romania), Nelly QUEMENER (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3, France), Brigitte HIPFL (Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria), Corina-Sorana MATEI (Université Spiru Haret, Roumanie), Cegolène FRISQUE (Université de Nantes, France), Ricarda DRUEKE (Universität Salzburg, Austria), Claire BLANDIN (Université Paris Est Créteil, France), Virginie JULLIARD (Université de technologie de Compiègne, France), Amiso M. GEORGE (TC University, Fort Worth, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA), Radha S. HEGDE (New York University, USA), Céline BRYON-PORTET (ENSIACET Toulouse, France), Catherine GHOSN (Paul Sabatier University, France), Lucian HERSCOVICI (Bibliothèque Nationale d'Israël, Université Hébraïque de Jérusalem), Diana Iulia NASTASIA (Southern Illinois University, Etats-Unis), HOSU Ramona (Petru Maior University Targu Mures, Roumanie), FENNICHE Raja (ISD, Université de la Manouba, Tunisie), Sunday ODEDELE (University of Nigeria, Nsukka; Partner, PR for Africa, Nigeria), PRICOPIE Valentina (Université Valahia, Roumanie), Delia BALABAN (Babes-Bolyai University Cluj, Roumanie), Lee BECKER (James M. Cox Jr. Center for International Mass Communication Training and Research, University of Georgia, USA), Françoise BERNARD (Université de Provence, France), Francine BOILLOT-GRENON (Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, France), Robert BOURE (Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse, France), Constantin BRATIANU (Académie d’Etudes Economiques de Bucarest, Roumanie), Olivier CHANTRAINE (Université Charles de Gaulle Lille 3, France), Mihai COMAN (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), Eric DACHEUX (Université Blaise Pascal de Clermont Ferrand, France), Gheorghe Clitan, Université de l'Ouest de Timisoara, Roumanie, Lise DEMAILLY (CLERSE UMR 8019, Université Lille 1, France), Ion DUR (Université Lucian Blaga Sibiu, Roumanie), Elena FELL (University of Central Lancaster, Great Britain), Sandu FRUNZA (Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie), Mihaela FRUNZA (Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie), Magda FUSARO (Homoludens - Groupe de recherche sur la communication et la socialisation dans les jeux vidéo, Université du Montréal à Québec, Canada), Gino GRAMACCIA (Université de Bordeaux 1, France), HOSU Ioan (Université Babes Bolyai, Cluj, Roumanie), Tamar KATRIEL (Université de Haifa, Israel), Roula KHOURY (Université St Joseph de Beyrouth, Liban), Gheorghe CLITAN (Université de Timisoara, Roumanie), Béatrice JALENQUES-VIGOUROUX (INSA, Toulouse IASCO, France), Léonard LABORIE (CNRS, France), Sylvie LELEU-MERVIEL (Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis, France), Pieter LEROY (Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands), Joëlle LE MAREC (ENS de Lyon, France), Christian LE MOËNNE (Université de Rennes 2, France), Thierry LIBAERT (Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgique), Florin LOBONT (Université d'Ouest Timisoara, Roumanie), Guy LOCHARD (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3, France), Margreth LŰNENBORG (Free University of Berlin, Germany), Dan STOICA (Université Al. I. Cuza, Roumanie), Regina Maria MARTELETO (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde, Université de Brésil, Brésil), Sorin NASTASIA (Southern Illinois University, USA), Akila NEDJAR-GUERRE (MRTE, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France), Viorica PAUS (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), Monica PADURARU (Académie d'Etudes Economiques, Roumanie), Dana RAD (Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Romania), Paul RASSE (Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, France), Daniela ROVENTA-FRUMUSANI (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), Constantin SALAVASTRU (Université « Al. I. Cuza » Iasi, Roumanie), Marie-Gabrielle SURAUD (CERTOP, Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse 3, France), Ilie RAD (Université Babes-Bolyai Cluj, Roumanie), Constantin SCHIFIRNET (Ecole Nationale d’Etudes Politiques et Administratives Bucarest, Roumanie), Panayiota TSATSOU (University of Leicester, Great Britain), Tudor VLAD (James M. Cox Jr. Center for International Mass Communication Training and Research, University of Georgia, USA), Nicolas PELISSIER (Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, France), Ilie FARTE (Université Al. I. Cuza Iasi, Roumanie), ROSCA Luminita (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), MEYER Vincent (Université de Lorraine, France), CHEVALIER Yves (Université Haute-Bretagne, France), Laurence BARNECHE-MIQUEUE (Université Paul Sabatier, France), Marie-Gabriel SURAUD (Université Paul Sabatier, France), Wilfried KOEPKE (University of Applied Science of Hanover, GERMANY), Stefan STANCIUGELU (SNSPA, Roumanie), Youcef AÏSSANI (Université Paul Sabatier, France), Cornel IATU, Université Al. I. Cuza de Iasi, Roumanie, Philippe JEANNIN (Université Paul Sabatier), Isabelle BOUCHARDY (Université Paul Sabatier, France), Anamaria BENEA (Université d'Ouest Timisoara, Roumanie), Falviu Calin RUS (Babes Bolyai University Cluj, Roumanie), Adela ROGOJINARU (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie), Marie-Michèle VENTURINI (Université de Corte, Corse), Patrice de la BROISE (Université Charles de Gaulle Lille 3, France), Irina STANCIUGELU (SNSPA, Roumanie), Sergey SAMOYLENKO (George Mason University, USA), Marco Túlio DE SOUSA (Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, UEMG - Brésil), Phillippe VIALLON (EA 2310 LISEC, UNISTRA, France), Constantin VICA (Université de Bucarest, Roumanie); Florian VÖRÖS (Université de Lille, France)
Ethics and malpractice statement / Déclaration d'éthique
ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies takes all possible measures against publication malpractice and does not tolerate plagiarism or other unethical behavior and will remove any manuscript that does not meet these standards. Manuscripts that fall outside these editorial guidelines may be declined without full review.
Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies is committed to ensuring that third parties involved in research work and studies (survey respondents, case studies, experimental subjects, etc.) are imperatively informed of the use made in the perspective a publication of the data collected resulting from their participation in the research activity. Authors must undertake in writing to preserve their anonymity and the journal must be informed of this by written commitment. The authors must also undertake not to have implemented research systems likely to compromise the integrity of people in their field of observation or during experiments. The authors must explicitly address possible ethical issues raised by the implementation of their research methodology, clearly specify the responses provided and discuss these responses without ethical ambiguity. The authors also undertake not to transgress the rules of scientific debate in the articles they submit or to make defamatory statements likely to damage the reputation of a third party. The editorial staff may ask authors to provide the raw data from their research. Where possible, authors are asked to commit to allowing public access to their data. To do this, the authors must provide elements in the submitted articles and its annexes so that the readers can verify the solidity of the work and so that the reader is able to reproduce or continue it.
For Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies' commitment to be complete and clearly stated, the journal encourages its reviewers, authors and editors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) website and to follow COPE’s Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.
Recommended Ethical Guidelines leading Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) - http://publicationethics.org/
- American Educational Research Association (AERA) - http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics(1).pdf
- American Political Science Association (APSA) - http://www.apsanet.org/RESOURCES/For-Faculty/Ethics
- American Psychological Association (APA) - http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
- British Educational Research Association (BERA) - https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/resources-for-researchers
- Guidelines for managing the relationships between society-owned journals, their society, and publishers - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/guidelines-managing-relationships-between-society-owned-journals-their-society
- Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing -https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing
- Journals’ Best Practices for ensuring consent for publishing medical case reports: guidance from COPE - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/journals%E2%80%99-best-practices-ensuring-consent-publishing-medical-case-reports
- Sharing of Information Among Editors-in-Chief Regarding Possible Misconduct - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/sharing-information-among-editors-chief-regarding-possible-misconduct
- Ethical Guidelines for peer reviewers (English version) - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers
- Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance COPE - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/cooperation-between-research-institutions-and-journals-research-integrity
- Guidelines for retracting articles - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/guidelines-retracting-articles
- Human research: Helsinki Declaration
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA guidelines (for protocols, see the PRISMA-P guidelines)
- Case reports: the CARE case report guidelines
Duties of Editorial Board
- Based on the review report of the editorial board, a manuscript can be accepted, rejected or can be sent the same for modification.
- The Editorial Board must evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, religious belief, sexual orientation, citizenship, ethnic origin or political philosophy of the authors.
- The Editorial Board must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
- The Editorial Board has the right to disclose any conflicts of interest.
- The Editorial Board keeps the identity of reviewers of an article hidden from the author/s of the paper, and from any other external instance. The evaluators do not know the identity of the author and vice versa.
Duties of Authors
- Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
- Authors confirm that their paper is their own; that it has not been copied or plagiarized, in whole or in part, from other works.
- Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in research work.
- Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
- If an author discovers significant error or inaccuracy in her/his published work, she/he has the obligation to notify the journal editor and also to cooperate with the editor to retract or if it’s possible to correct the article.
- Authorship should be composed to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, structure or interpretation of the article. Any other person who has made significant contribution for the article must be listed as co-authors. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
Duties of Reviewers
- Reviewers must keep all the information pertaining to the manuscript confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
- Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Reviewers have the right to identify relevant published work that has not been cited in the manuscript by authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
- Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
***
ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies ne tolère pas le plagiat ou tout autre comportement contraire à l'éthique. Les manuscrits qui ne respectent pas ces normes éditoriales peuvent être refusés sans examen complet.
Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies est engagé à ce que les tiers impliqués dans les travaux et études de recherche (répondants d’enquête, étude de cas, sujet d’expérimentations, etc.) soient impérativement informés de l’usage fait dans la perspective d’une publication des données recueillies issues de leur participation à l’activité de recherche. Les auteurs doivent s’engager par écrit à préserver leur anonymat et la revue doit en être informée par engagement écrit. Les auteurs doivent également s’engager à ne pas avoir mis en œuvre des dispositifs de recherche susceptibles de compromettre l’intégrité des personnes sur leur terrain d’observation ou lors des expérimentations. Les auteurs doivent explicitement aborder les éventuelles problématiques d’ordre éthique soulevées par la mise en œuvre de leur méthodologie de recherche, préciser clairement les réponses apportées et discuter ces réponses sans ambiguïté éthique. Les auteurs s’engagent également à ne pas transgresser les règles du débat scientifique dans les articles qu’ils soumettent ou à faire des déclarations diffamatoires susceptibles de porter atteinte à la réputation d’un tiers. La rédaction peut demander aux auteurs de fournir les données brutes de leurs recherches. Dans la mesure du possible, les auteurs sont invités à s’engager à permettre au public d’accéder à leurs données. Pour ce faire, les auteurs doivent fournir dans le texte soumis et ses annexes des éléments pour que le public puisse vérifier la solidité des travaux et pour que le lecteur puisse les reproduire ou les poursuivre. Pour que l’engagement d’Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies soit complet et clairement statué, la revue encourage ses évaluateurs, auteurs et éditeurs à se référer au site Web du Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) website et t à suivre les principes de transparence et les meilleures pratiques du COPEPrinciples of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.
Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies is committed to ensuring that third parties involved in research work and studies (survey respondents, case studies, experimental subjects, etc.) are imperatively informed of the use made in the perspective a publication of the data collected resulting from their participation in the research activity. Authors must undertake in writing to preserve their anonymity and the journal must be informed of this by written commitment. The authors must also undertake not to have implemented research systems likely to compromise the integrity of people in their field of observation or during experiments. The authors must explicitly address possible ethical issues raised by the implementation of their research methodology, clearly specify the responses provided and discuss these responses without ethical ambiguity. The authors also undertake not to transgress the rules of scientific debate in the articles they submit or to make defamatory statements likely to damage the reputation of a third party. The editorial staff may ask authors to provide the raw data from their research. Where possible, authors are asked to commit to allowing public access to their data. To do this, the authors must provide elements in the submitted articles and its annexes so that the readers can verify the solidity of the work and so that the reader is able to reproduce or continue it.
For Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies' commitment to be complete and clearly stated, the journal encourages its reviewers, authors and editors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) website and to follow COPE’s Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.
Lignes directrices éthiques recommandées qui guident la revue Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) - http://publicationethics.org/
- American Educational Research Association (AERA) - http://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics(1).pdf
- American Political Science Association (APSA) - http://www.apsanet.org/RESOURCES/For-Faculty/Ethics
- American Psychological Association (APA) - http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
- British Educational Research Association (BERA) - https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/resources-for-researchers
- Guidelines for managing the relationships between society-owned journals, their society, and publishers - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/guidelines-managing-relationships-between-society-owned-journals-their-society
- Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing -https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing
- Journals’ Best Practices for ensuring consent for publishing medical case reports: guidance from COPE - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines/journals%E2%80%99-best-practices-ensuring-consent-publishing-medical-case-reports
- Sharing of Information Among Editors-in-Chief Regarding Possible Misconduct - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/sharing-information-among-editors-chief-regarding-possible-misconduct
- Ethical Guidelines for peer reviewers (English version) - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers
- Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance COPE - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/cooperation-between-research-institutions-and-journals-research-integrity
- Guidelines for retracting articles - https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/guidelines-retracting-articles
- Human research: Helsinki Declaration
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA guidelines (for protocols, see the PRISMA-P guidelines)
- Case reports: the CARE case report guidelines
Obligation du comité de rédaction
1. Le comité de rédaction peut accepter, rejeter ou envoyer un manuscrit pour modification sur la base des évaluations en double aveugle faites par les experts évaluateurs.
2. La grille d’évaluation proposée par le comité de rédaction doit évaluer seulement le contenu intellectuel du manuscrit sans distinction de race, de sexe, de croyance religieuse, orientation sexuelle, nationalité, origine ethnique ou philosophie politique des auteurs.
3. Le comité de rédaction ne doit divulguer aucune information sur les manuscrits soumis à une personne autre que l'auteur, les membres du comité de rédaction ou l'éditeur, le cas échéant.
4. Le comité de rédaction se réserve le droit de divulguer tout conflit d'intérêts.
5. Le comité de rédaction s'engage à respecter l'anonymat des évaluateurs auxquels il a transmis l'article pour évaluation. Les évaluateurs ne connaissent pas l'identité de l'auteur et vice-versa.
Obligations des auteurs
1. Les auteurs doivent certifier que leur manuscrit représente leur œuvre originale.
2. Les auteurs confirment que leur article leur est propre, qu'il n'a pas été copié ou plagié, en tout ou en partie, par d'autres travaux.
3. Les auteurs doivent reconnaître toutes les sources utilisées dans la recherche et citer les publications qui ont été utilisées dans leur travail de recherche.
4. Les auteurs doivent certifier que le manuscrit n'a pas déjà été publié ailleurs.
5. Si un / une auteur(e) découvre une erreur ou une inexactitude importante dans son article publié, il / elle a l'obligation d'aviser le rédacteur en chef de la revue et de coopérer avec l'éditeur afin de faire corriger l'article.
Obligations des évaluateurs
1. Les évaluateurs doivent garder la confidentialité sur les textes qui ont été transmis pour évaluation. Ces textes ne doivent pas être présentés ou discutés avec d’autres.
2. L’examen des manuscrits soumis doit être fait de manière objective et les évaluateurs doivent exprimer clairement leurs points de vue avec des arguments à l'appui.
3. Les évaluateurs ont le droit de déterminer quels sont les travaux pertinents qui devraient être cités dans le manuscrit soumis en vue de publication.
4. Tout évaluateur qui considère que le manuscrit à évaluer ne fait pas partie de son champ de recherche ou qui sait qu’une évaluation dans les délais impartis sera impossible devra en informer la direction de la rédaction.
Allegations of misconduct
Essachess’ process and policies for identification of/dealing with allegations of misconduct
Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies through his Ethics Committee is vigilant in upholding the ethical standards of research conduct and publishing, and takes appropriate actions on forms of misconduct such as (the list is not exhaustive):
- Falsification and fabrication of data (i.e. manipulative or willful suppression and/or misrepresentation of data, omission, contradictory data, etc.);
- Plagiarism and/or misuse of intellectual property (i.e. using language, ideas, and/or thoughts of existing or previously published articles/papers/materials without appropriate reference to the original source, etc.);
- Non-compliance with common research practices (i.e. failure to comply with accepted and ethical practices regarding research design, manipulating procedures or results to obtain pre-determined results, etc.);
- Non-conformity to research guidelines (i.e. conformity with recognized guidelines, laws and standards, non-violation of regulations and law involving the use of funds, care of animals, human subjects, drugs, biological or chemical materials, etc.);
- Authorship (i.e. submitting multi-author drafts without the consent of all authors, improper attribution of author credits, etc.).
Suspected cases of misconduct should be reported to Essachess’ Ethics Committee respecting confidentiality and international established standards and guidelines. Essachess’ Ethics Committee is consisted of the Essachess Editor-in-Chief, and associate editors. The Editor-in-Chief chairs it. Its role is to respond to the complaints received by the editorial staff. If necessary, the Editor-in-Chief will include Essachess’ reviewers or/and advice from the advisory board in the process to obtain their opinion.
Concerns of any form of publication misconduct, as described above or in other established standards, laws, and guidelines, should be e-mailed to Essachess Editorial Office at essachess@gmail.com.
The form letter bellow could be used.
Form letter: To Editor regarding a suspected case of misconduct
Any letter should include all of the following:
1. First Name and Last Name
2. Title of article and elements of identification
3. Allegation of misconduct (suspected case of misconduct) – please clearly specify which violation is suspected
4. Original documents or materials (i.e. articles, papers with plagiarized passages and copy of sources not quoted, non-compliance with common research practices, falsification, authorship, etc.)
Form letter: To author regarding a published article
Date
Title of article and date of publication
To the attention of (the author)
Dear author,
Information about the existence of concerns.
Description of the nature of concern based on the communication raising the concern (which would violate the publishing policies)
Answer request within 30 days.
Further actions and measures depending on the nature of corresponding author’s response (inform or/and involve research institution, funding agency, etc.).
Sincerely,
Editor name
Journal will publish errata/corrections, clarifications, or retractions of any materials where appropriate.
Complaints process
Before submitting manuscripts authors should read all the guidelines, ethical statements and policies regarding manuscript submission, processing and publication.
The authors have the right to complain and ask clarifications and further explanations if they perceive any misconduct in guidelines, ethical statements and policies applied by the journal.
All the complaints could be raised via a letter at essachess@gmail.com. Letter forms are available in Allegations of misconduct section.
All complaints are investigated according to the publication ethics practices (see also sections Ethics and malpractice statement, Peer Review Process, Author Guidelines, Ensuring a Blind Peer Review, Privacy Statement, and Allegations of misconduct).
Subjects of complaints (but not limited): authorship issues, plagiarism, copyright violation, wrong research results, peer-review comments unsatisfactorily, conflicts of interest, violations in design standards for research, biases in review process, manuscript processing unusually late, etc. The process with dealing with complaints is detailed in Allegations of misconduct section. All decisions taken are sent to the concerned author through his/her submitted email address.
Conflicts of interest
Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies requests authors and reviewers prior to submitting or agreeing to review a manuscript provide a conflict of interest statement, to warrant no such conflicts exist.
The authors have to declare funding sources (if any).
More details regarding conflict of interests for reviewers and authors in Ethics and malpractice statement section.
The members of editorial team and editorial board must declare any conflicts of interest prior to joining the editorial team or editorial board.
Editors and journal staff are not involved in editorial process and decisions about their own research work submitted to the journal. Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies handles submissions from editors and members of its editorial board as following:
- editors and editorial team and board are not allowed to take part to publication process and decision when they are authors or have contributed to a submitted manuscript.
- for ensuring a fair peer review in editorial team in the case of a submission from editors and members of editorial board, the journal requests the author do not communicate directly with the editor-in-chief. The author should communicate directly only with the assistant editor in charge.
- for ensuring a fair peer review in editorial team in the case of a submission from editors and members of editorial board, the journal requests any author will not be given special treatment.
Authorship criteria
Authorship should be composed to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, structure or interpretation of the article. Any other person who has made significant contribution for the article must be listed as co-authors. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
See Duties of Authors sub-section in Ethics and malpractice statement sectionCopyright/Droits d'auteur
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
***
Les auteurs conservent les droits d'auteur. Les auteurs ont le droit d'utiliser une partie ou l’intégralité de leurs textes publiés dans Essachess – Journal for Communication Studies dans la préparation d’autres travaux (chapitre d’ouvrage, ouvrage, thèse, mémoire, etc.). Les auteurs doivent mentionner que leur texte a été publié dans sa version originale dans Essachess - Journal for Communication Studies et indiquer le titre de l'article, le nom de la revue, le volume, le numéro, les numéros de page, l'année de publication. Les auteurs doivent respecter les termes de la Creative Commons Attribution License.
Contact
ESSACHESS
www.essachess.com
essachess@gmail.com